Post pandemic hybrid learning, go or no-go?
The Free Press Journal in India recently wrote on the potential of hybrid learning model for schools this post-pandemic.
Is it a “go” or a “no”? Let us explore the pros and cons.
But before that, what is hybrid learning?
Hybrid or blended learning is a combination of face-to-face sessions with technology-based activities. It lessens the seat time of lectures, and moves towards online course delivery.
It can be both asynchronous and synchronous, depends on the curriculum structure. More importantly, this kind of learning model is happening both online and offline setup with the use of technology.
According to The Free Press Journal’s article, about less or a half preferred this model of learning in India–57% of students, 48% of parents, and 44% of teachers with the following advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages:
- It makes classrooms more engaging, accessible, and practical
- Increases the readiness of graduates to enter the workforce
Disadvantages:
- Not everyone can afford to study with technology, especially in far-flung areas
- Schools need to be technology-advanced to implement this model
But whether they prefer it or not, the shift has already happened. Education 3.0 is already here, and it’s all about the online or hybrid learning model.
What is Education 3.0?
The future of learning was foreseen and written by experts years ago. Dr. Jeff Borden from Pearson talked about Education 3.0, embracing technology in our classrooms.
Education 3.0 is a whole new game of teaching with the use of technology. It requires educators to think forward and bridge the gap between what they teach in schools vs. the skills needed in the workforce.
In the simple formula, it’s:
Please continue reading this article at cohortland.com , it’s free.
